Re: film ecology

From: Steven Budden (email suppressed)
Date: Fri Mar 03 2006 - 12:37:08 PST


"Well, killing off 7361 (B&W reversal print stock) at the same time was incredibly idiotic of them."
 
They say it would take a few million to reconfigure that stock to work with the reconfigured reversal stock, and it isn't worth it because most who shoot on reversal project original or go to digital. It is highly irritating, to say the least.
 
Steven
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Kreines <email suppressed>
To: email suppressed
Sent: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 13:13:33 -0600
Subject: Re: film ecology

On Mar 3, 2006, at 12:34 PM, David Tetzlaff wrote:
 
> (This is one reason Kodak will eventually ease out of the film > business
> altogether: the restrictions of environemental legislation ala > Kyoto will
> severely limit the world market. Kodak made a very large finacial
> investment to reformulate BW 16mm stocks to make the process less > toxic,
> but I doubt they have or will recoup the investment...)
>
 
Well, killing off 7361 (B&W reversal print stock) at the same time was incredibly idiotic of them.
 
__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.

__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.