From: owen (email suppressed)
Date: Sun Mar 05 2006 - 21:40:27 PST
Jeff ?
On Mar 6, 2006, at 12:35 AM, Mitsu Hadeishi wrote:
> On Sunday 05 March 2006 22:30, Sam Wells wrote:
>> Mitsu Hadeishi wrote:
>>> --- I
>>> am saying that the light responsiveness of a film camera is
>>> something
>>> that
>>> one should eventually be able to get with digital cameras;
>>
>> It's turned out to be a bigger "should" than we might have thought,
>> though. (and the amounts of data are not insignificant either).
>
> Give it time. HD cameras have only been in serious use in film
> production in
> the last several years, and it seems to make a big difference how
> you use
> them. People are only recently getting used to these cameras and
> learning
> their properties, and already the results can be quite impressive.
> I can't
> see how things won't continue to improve, and now that HD prosumer
> cameras
> are available at reasonable prices, the number of people and know-
> how out
> there is bound to continue to grow.
>
> M
>
> --
> http://www.syntheticzero.com/
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.