From: nicole koschmann (email suppressed)
Date: Fri Jan 19 2007 - 09:12:26 PST
yes, I agree with you on both points.
Nicole
>From: Jack Sargeant <email suppressed>
>Reply-To: Experimental Film Discussion List <email suppressed>
>To: email suppressed
>Subject: Re: Feminism for Men
>Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:54:29 +1100
>
>teaching it is as a stimulus to debate is obviously good.... but its the
>UNCRITICAL part that i am 'unhappy' with....(as i said in the quote below)
>i am, i have to confess, surprised that people here accept mulvey's use of
>psychoanalysis so readily.
>as i said i feel that she is too beholden to psychoanlaysis as an
>authentic truth and that has serious ramifications regarding sexuality and
>so on.
>
>i also think she prioritises gaze as an experience of cinema above the
>aural.
>
>jack
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Search for grocery stores. Find gratitude. Turn a simple search into
something more.
http://click4thecause.live.com/search/charity/default.aspx?source=hmemtagline_gratitude&FORM=WLMTAG
__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.