Re: protest nyc's proposed film and photo law

From: MARLON GONZALEZ (email suppressed)
Date: Mon Aug 06 2007 - 12:49:17 PDT


okay. thank you for explaining to me how it works. From now on I will
simply hit delete when I
do not wish to follow a thread.
thanks again!

>From: owen <email suppressed>
>Reply-To: Experimental Film Discussion List <email suppressed>
>To: email suppressed
>Subject: Re: protest nyc's proposed film and photo law
>Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 15:17:48 -0400
>
>No. I will not stop discussing this issue. Simply hit delete if you do not
>wish to follow this thread. That's how it works.
>owen
>
>
>On Aug 6, 2007, at 2:47 PM, MARLON GONZALEZ wrote:
>
>>Is there any way you guys can continue talking about this off list? i
>>agree that this proposed film and photo law is garbage but every 2
>>seconds everyone's inbox is full with back and fourth conversation. New
>>York City will do what it wants and we will all do what we've always done
>>when there's a law that's unfair- break it. So shoot and run- and that's
>>it. case closed until the next stupid law.
>>
>>
>>>From: flick harrison <email suppressed>
>>>Reply-To: Experimental Film Discussion List
>>><email suppressed>
>>>To: email suppressed
>>>Subject: Re: protest nyc's proposed film and photo law
>>>Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:19:14 -0700
>>>
>>>On 5-Aug-07, at 6:54 PM, Jim Carlile wrote:
>>>
>>>>If they'd had permits and notification, there would not have been a
>>>>problem for them. If those students wanted to shoot a public service
>>>>announcement with TOY guns, there's nothing wrong with that. That's
>>>>what they did-- it was an assignment for a film production class
>>>
>>>So now it's permits AND notification, but nevermind that.
>>>
>>>Your examples of cases in which it might be reasonable to require
>>>permits are in no way refutations of the many examples in which it is
>>>NOT reasonable to require permits. The ones do not counter the others.
>>>
>>>If you're waving guns on the street, obviously you should have permits
>>>or some system of calming the public down.
>>>
>>>But a public performance involving guns BUT NOT involving cameras isn't
>>>covered by the new rules.
>>>
>>>So, any other examples?
>>>
>>>
>>>* FLICK's WEBSITE:
>>>http://www.flickharrison.com
>>>* MYSPACE:
>>>http://myspace.com/flickharrison
>>>* BLOG / NEWS:
>>>http://zeroforconduct.blogspot.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>__________________________________________________________________
>>>For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
>>>
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>Learn.Laugh.Share. Reallivemoms is right place! http://
>>www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us
>>
>>
>>__________________________________________________________________
>>For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
>
>
>__________________________________________________________________
>For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.

_________________________________________________________________
Find a local pizza place, movie theater, and more….then map the best route!
http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&ss=yp.bars~yp.pizza~yp.movie%20theater&cp=42.358996~-71.056691&style=r&lvl=13&tilt=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&scene=950607&encType=1&FORM=MGAC01

__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.