From: mat fleming (email suppressed)
Date: Mon Jun 15 2009 - 02:44:22 PDT
We ran Eric Rhomer's "L'Amour D'Astre et Celadon" last night in our cinema.
The film was made a couple of years ago in 1:1.33 (blow up from std 16mm).
It had been printed at thought it was 1:1.85 with black bars up the side as
well as top and bottom which i'd never seen done before. It is a neat
solution. We have no 1.33 aperture but with the scope apeture (which is
taller than 1:33) and the right lens and proper screen masking it's really
the same thing. I would have thought festival venues and venues used to
showing old films and art films should have no trouble at all as long as
they're made aware of the aspect in advance.
It's a great film if you the chance to see it.
Mat
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Ed Inman <email suppressed> wrote:
> A regular scope aperture plate with a flat lens would theoretically give
> you about 1:1.18 which might be close enough. You would still need a longer
> lens (or perhaps a zoom attachment that can reduce) to fit the frame
> vertically in the screen.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: Myron Ort <email suppressed>
> >Sent: Jun 14, 2009 4:43 PM
> >To: email suppressed
> >Subject: Re: 35mm projection options
> >
> >That is discouraging news. I was hoping that "1:33 full" was not that
> >uncommon. This is the format which A) has a soundtrack area, and B)
> >uses the frame all the way to the h/v edges (eg. not cropped down).
> >Do I have my nomenclature correct by calling this "1:33 full"?
> >I was hoping to be able to show it as a film. But it does emphasize
> >the point to me that digital projection avoids all this. Once
> >transferred to digital, these aspect ratio issues seem so much easier
> >to deal with.
> >
> >Myron
> >
> >On Jun 14, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Ed Inman wrote:
> >
> >> Only a few specialty cinemas will likely be set up for anything
> >> other than 1.85 flat or 2.35 scope, although most cinema equipment
> >> dealers can easily enough order the necessary additional aperture
> >> plates for whatever projector is being used.
> >> There is also no shortage of older used lenses sitting around in
> >> warehouses for $50 or $100 a pop, although new ones can cost
> >> thousands of dollars.
> >> If you know the exact footage from the projector to the screen
> >> there is a lens calculator downloadable at film-tech.com that will
> >> guide you as to what length lenses are needed for various formats.
> >> Ed
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Myron Ort <email suppressed>
> >>> Sent: Jun 14, 2009 2:49 PM
> >>> To: email suppressed
> >>> Subject: Re: 35mm projection options
> >>>
> >>> Do venues which show 35mm film usually have all the gate options?
> >>>
> >>> Say, If I have a print which is "1:33 full" (with soundtrack), can I
> >>> assume venues which show 35mm can accommodate? Say I have a film
> >>> which is "Super 35mm raw" that is to say "Ye Olde Edison silent
> >>> format" ?
> >>> Seems like a big can of worms to me at this point. Maybe I am making
> >>> this more complicated than it is.
> >>>
> >>> (much of my thinking here is due to economics, that is, avoiding
> >>> expensive optical reformatting lab work)
> >>>
> >>> What 35mm format is "Garden of Earthly Delights", for example.
> >>>
> >>> Myron Ort
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> __________________________________________________________________
> >>> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
> >>
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________________________
> >> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
> >>
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________________________
> >For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
>
__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.