From: Lundgren (email suppressed)
Date: Wed Aug 05 2009 - 10:47:02 PDT
I think the clip is an experimental film in it's own sense.
We should always have a wide definition of art, and we should try to
interprete any work of art as a good work of art.
Therefore I see no other thing to do than to consider this a really great
experimental satire.
Björn Lundgren
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Stark" <email suppressed>
To: <email suppressed>
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: Murdoch's Falsehoods [Was: Kuchar/McDowell screen on Fox News!]
> At 06:19 PM 8/2/2009 -0700, Chuck Kleinhans wrote:
>
>>They also seem to not grasp the fact that the film was made in 1975 and is
>>not being funded by the NEA.
>
> Actually I think they were very carefully creating this confusion. If you
> listen closely they do state that the funding went to the "theater" that
> was planning to show the film, not the film itself, but that goes by very
> quickly and they made sure to blur that distinction with the "shocking"
> imagery and voice-over details.
>
> I think the Fox team is actually very smart and crafty, and has a lot of
> fun making stuff up.
>
> Scott
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
>
__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.