From: Lundgren (email suppressed)
Date: Thu Aug 06 2009 - 08:48:15 PDT
It's funny. Because at first I was laughing at Fox. But now there's a whole
bunch of people to laugh at. Thx! :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fred Davidson" <email suppressed>
To: <email suppressed>
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: Murdoch's Falsehoods [Was: Kuchar/McDowell screen on Fox News!]
> You may laugh now but it is we who will have the last laugh. We will
> laugh last because we know what appropriate cleavage to show or not to
> show is and FOX simply does not. They are reprehensible. They are slime.
> They are the enemy. So have your laugh, enjoy it while you can. Your days
> are numbered.
>
> Fred Davidson
> Boca Raton
>
> On Aug 6, 2009, at 8:16 AM, Lundgren wrote:
>
>> You need to learn to turn the other check. ;)
>>
>> Fox isn't really a problem. If everyone reacted the way I guess most
>> Frameworkers do to that clip (okay I laughed - I don't care anymore,
>> it's just fun) then there'd be no problem and there'd be no Fox.
>>
>> You see, I really think the eggS came first.
>>
>> Bjorn Lundgren
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Conrad" <email suppressed>
>> To: <email suppressed>
>> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 3:26 AM
>> Subject: Re: Murdoch's Falsehoods [Was: Kuchar/McDowell screen on Fox
>> News!]
>>
>>
>>> Wake up!
>>>
>>> I agree with Gregg Biermann. Fox is the ENEMY; the ENEMY; the ENEMY.
>>>
>>> Not that your slushy liberalism is going to have any effect (except
>>> stiffening the spines of some of us who see things more clearly), but
>>> your remarks certainly represent the final disintegration of
>>> "experimental" into complete meaninglessness. "Art" as well, it
>>> appears.........
>>>
>>> -----t0ny
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed 08/05/09 1:47 PM , Lundgren email suppressed sent:
>>>> I think the clip is an experimental film in it's own sense.
>>>>
>>>> We should always have a wide definition of art, and we should try to
>>>> interprete any work of art as a good work of art.
>>>>
>>>> Therefore I see no other thing to do than to consider this a really
>>>> great
>>>> experimental satire.
>>>>
>>>> Björn Lundgren
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Stark" BEAM.NET>To:
>>>> email suppressed
>>>> >Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 9:15 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: Murdoch's Falsehoods [Was: Kuchar/McDowell screen on Fox
>>>> News!]
>>>>
>>>> > At 06:19 PM 8/2/2009 -0700, Chuck Kleinhans
>>>> wrote:>
>>>> >>They also seem to not grasp the fact that the
>>>> film was made in 1975 and is >>not being funded by the NEA.
>>>> >
>>>> > Actually I think they were very carefully
>>>> creating this confusion. If you > listen closely they do state that
>>>> the funding
>>>> went to the "theater" that > was planning to show the film, not the
>>>> film
>>>> itself, but that goes by very > quickly and they made sure to blur
>>>> that
>>>> distinction with the "shocking" > imagery and voice-over details.
>>>> >
>>>> > I think the Fox team is actually very smart and
>>>> crafty, and has a lot of > fun making stuff up.
>>>> >
>>>> > Scott
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> __________________________________________________________________
>>>> > For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at
>>>> om>.>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________________________
>>>> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at om>.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________
>>> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________
>> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
>
__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.