Re: Why couldn't it have been double-x!???

From: Tim Halloran (email suppressed)
Date: Tue Apr 06 2010 - 15:18:28 PDT


Agreed. Very disappointing all around.

 

Tim
 

Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 12:19:57 -0700
From: email suppressed
Subject: Why couldn't it have been double-x!???
To: email suppressed

I have to vent about this to some people who might understand.

The yellow giant are a mystery to me, from the fact that they refuse to sell me certain products to the strangee and bizzare choices they make in their product lineup.

I mean is there anybody here who is a huge fan of double-x negative?
Somebody must be, please speak up.
Personally I really dislike the look of the stock for the most part although I guess it has it's uses but it seems to lack much in the way of special film magic.

I feel really shook up by this latest announcement as I'm still dealing with the whole kodachrome thing. (Literally, as dwaynes discontinues processing at the end of this year). I was talking to another film maker a week or so ago about how it was a bit of difficult timing but that we would manage somehow.

This is on top of the local (and only local) lab closing.

Really don't need this too.

Freya

__________________________________________________________________ For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.

                                               
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3

__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.