From: email suppressed
Date: Sun Jun 13 2010 - 10:00:15 PDT
Send FrameWorks mailing list submissions to
email suppressed
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
email suppressed
You can reach the person managing the list at
email suppressed
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of FrameWorks digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Canyon Cinema paper archives (Steve Polta)
2. please unsubscribe me from the frameworks list (Leo Cardoso)
3. Re: please unsubscribe me from the frameworks list
(steven eastwood)
4. Re: super8 telecine - with cinelab? (rebecca meyers)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 10:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Steve Polta <email suppressed>
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Canyon Cinema paper archives
To: Experimental Film Discussion List <email suppressed>
Message-ID: <email suppressed>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Following up on this, I do not believe that the articles Dominic links to mention that the finding aid to the paper archive of Canyon Cinema, 1961?2009, which is now housed at Stanford University, can be browsed, via the Online Archive of California, here:
www.oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt538nf1rj
(Stanford's library website does not, at present, include this complete finding aid. I don't know why.)
I am proud to say that, in the fall of 2009, I was employed by Stanford as a "processing archivist" of this collection and am the creator of this finding aid. As such, I am familar with the content and arrangement of this collection and am pleased to answer any questions about it that potential users (or anyone else) may have.
Sincerely,
Steve Polta
--- On Tue, 6/8/10, DOMINIC ANGERAME <email suppressed> wrote:
From: DOMINIC ANGERAME <email suppressed>
Subject: [Frameworks] Canyon Cinema paper archives
To: "Experimental Film Discussion List" <email suppressed>
Date: Tuesday, June 8, 2010, 12:18 PM
Canyon Cinema paper archives acquired by Stanford University Libraries
For further information please go to the news section of the Canyon Cinema website www.canyoncinema.com
Thanks
Dominic Angerame
Executive Director, Canyon Cinema
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
email suppressed
http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/frameworks/attachments/20100612/2502240a/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:45:15 -0500
From: Leo Cardoso <email suppressed>
Subject: [Frameworks] please unsubscribe me from the frameworks list
To: email suppressed
Message-ID:
<email suppressed>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Thank you.
Leo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/frameworks/attachments/20100612/994beafa/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:46:15 +0100
From: steven eastwood <email suppressed>
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] please unsubscribe me from the frameworks
list
To: Experimental Film Discussion List <email suppressed>
Message-ID:
<email suppressed>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
please unsubscribe me also, thanks
-- Steven Eastwood Filmmaker Programme Leader, Film & Video: theory & practice University of East London Paradogs 1st Floor, 17-25 Cremer Street London E2 8HD, UK email suppressed www.cinemaintothereal.com www.paradogs.org.uk www.omsk.org.uk +44 (0)7850 411662 OMSKBOOK: a testing ground for film, video, live art, sound and mayhem Available now at www.omsk.org.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/frameworks/attachments/20100612/baef7fbd/attachment-0001.html ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 08:51:46 -0400 From: rebecca meyers <email suppressed> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] super8 telecine - with cinelab? To: Experimental Film Discussion List <email suppressed> Message-ID: <email suppressed> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Cinelab just did a best-lite HD transfer of my 16mm workprint. I've only ever had SD transfers before and have never seen my film translate to video so well. The job was well-done and affordable. It was my first time working with Cinelab and based on my experience I would recommend them. Rebecca Meyers Cambridge MA On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Dave Andrae <email suppressed> wrote: > It's not my intention to beat a dead horse, but while doing a standard > definition transfer CineLab scratched my footage - not all of it, mind you, > but enough that at least two or three crucial takes were marred. > > I didn't notice the damage until a few months after the fact, while I was > inspecting the film on my Goko moviola (in preparation for getting portions > of it scanned by Pro8mm). > > The scratch ran between two rolls, so I know it was CineLab's doing and > not caused by my SU-60-E (up to that point no one but CineLab had handled > the footage). > > Thankfully, I ended up being able to work around the damage, and the film I > was working on turned out to be pretty good ( you can read about it here: > http://daveandrae.wordpress.com ), but it was definitely a kick in the > balls at the time. > > As for getting your film scanned in HD, I think it's worth the money--you > get what you pay for. > > A lot of money can be saved though if you know ahead of time what you're > going to use and go through the trouble of splicing together exactly what > you need and nothing more. > > The nice thing about Pro8mm's machine is that it doesn't touch the film's > emulsion at any point in the scanning process, and a progressive scan at > 1080 looks quite nice. > > As for getting 4:3 footage scanned in 16:9, you could always blow it up, > but personally I don't mind the look of pillar boxes, and most viewers won't > notice them once your film is underway. > > Best, > > -DA > > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Serge Levchin <email suppressed>wrote: > >> hello list, >> i know this question comes up every so often - and there was a discussion >> here not too long ago about some of the better options for transferring >> super8 to video. >> places like pro8mm have been recommended. pro8mm's rates for SD transfer >> are fairly reasonable, but HD is 4 times the price. ($825 for 500ft. of >> film). >> CineLab appears to offer 1080p HD transfers at .37/ft (scene to scene >> color corr.) - i.e. $185 for 500ft. of film. >> >> - has anyone tried CineLab for HD or SD telecine? >> - is the image quality of a Millennium2 or Ursa Diamond Y-front telecine >> (Pro8mm) that much greater than a Rank Cintel transfer (CineLab)? >> - does HD telecine make sense for super8 (especially considering there is >> an aspect ratio mismatch)? >> >> thanks and best regards, >> serge >> _______________________________________________ >> FrameWorks mailing list >> email suppressed >> http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >> >> > > > -- > http://www.dave-andrae.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > email suppressed > http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/frameworks/attachments/20100613/d0e0e884/attachment-0001.html ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list email suppressed http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks End of FrameWorks Digest, Vol 1, Issue 29 *****************************************