From: anja ross (email suppressed)
Date: Sat Jul 24 2010 - 04:08:45 PDT
*HELLO MY FRIEND ROB, I IMPROVED WITH COLOUR : WISHES BY THE WAY, ANJA C.
ROSS*
2010/7/24 Gawthrop, Rob <email suppressed>
> Gregg/Steven
>
> Art* cannot ?? Art comes from Artificial!* exist automonously, there will
> *always* be contexts (and *agents sorry man* *HELP*!).
>
> Don’t your “categories” come within aesthetics? i.e. as per Jacques
> Ranciere’s definition:
>
> “In its broad sense, however, aesthetics refers to the distribution of the
> sensible that determines a mode of articulation between *forms of action*,
> *production and thought*. This general definition extends aesthetics
> beynd the strict realm of art to include the conceptual coordinates and
> modes of visibility operative in the political domain.” p82 Ranciere J. *Politics
> of Aesthetics*, 2006, (Continuum, London)
>
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> On 23/07/2010 21:36, "gregg biermann" <email suppressed> wrote:
>
> Steven,
> Isn't the fact that something is considered art at all strong evidence of a
> context? All of the questions about categories (genre, tradition, medium,
> style, movement) or aesthetics that are being discussed seem to come from
> that understanding.
> G
>
> Steven Gladstone wrote:
>
> Does Art need Context to be Art?
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3023 - Release Date: 07/23/10
> 02:36:00
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> email suppressed
> http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> email suppressed
> http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
email suppressed
http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks