From: Matt Helme (email suppressed)
Date: Wed Feb 16 2011 - 09:49:01 PST
You can meet and chat with people without spending 40 bucks on an entry fee.
Matt
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ff-94PXtixo
________________________________
From: "Beebe,Roger W" <email suppressed>
To: Experimental Film Discussion List <email suppressed>
Sent: Wed, February 16, 2011 12:43:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] [QUARANTINE NOT SET UP] Re: Current situation with
Film Festivals
Great answer! (FLEXfest starts tomorrow!)
...
Roger
Gainesville, FL
________________________________________
From: email suppressed
[email suppressed] On Behalf Of Bryan McKay
[email suppressed]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 12:30 PM
To: Experimental Film Discussion List
Subject: [QUARANTINE NOT SET UP] Re: [Frameworks] Current situation with Film
Festivals
Because watching a film in the theatre still beats watching one on your computer
screen? Because YouTube still can't manage to screen 35mm or 16mm? Because you
want to support your local arts community? Because the sort of curation that
goes on at festival screenings can elaborate heretofore unseen thematic or
aesthetic links between disparate works? Because you might actually get a chance
to meet and chat with the filmmaker whose work you've just enjoyed? Because
having a shared experience in a dark room with a bunch of other people can be a
profoundly moving experience?
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Matt Helme
<email suppressed>> wrote:
When you can put your work on-line and have it seen worldwide, why bother with
festivals?
Matt
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ff-94PXtixo
________________________________
From: D Dawson <email suppressed>>
To: Experimental Film Discussion List
<email suppressed>>
Sent: Wed, February 16, 2011 12:11:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Current situation with Film Festivals
I agree with Dominic, I have heard horror stories about festivals sending home
150 tapes each to 5 individual undergrads telling them to choose 20 that “he/she
likes” no mention of the criteria of evaluation or the fact that a single
person’s judgment might throw off the whole process. I mean realistically how
else are you going to get through 1000-2000 films right?
Deco
On 2/16/11 10:38 AM, "DOMINIC ANGERAME"
<email suppressed>> wrote:
I am noticing an alarming trend these days with experimental film festivals
throughout the world. I received a notice from the Images Festival in Canada
that they received more than 1,000 entries for exhibition. I am sure that Ann
Arbor Film Festival received far more entries than the 150 films they are
viewing. Since is seems that almost everyone is a filmmaker these days that the
structure and procedures of the major experimental film festivals should be
changed in major ways. Virtually all festivals charge an fee for entry. 1000
entries can mean $25,000 going to the festivals for admin/pre-screening, etc.
This does not include the donations, governmental grants, and other sources of
income. I used to run a couple of festivals and understand the purpose of entry
fees to help defray costs. However, since the number of entries for many
festivals has risen more than 3 or 4 times the amount the festivals need to
consider extending their exhibitions to accomodate the amount of entries. Most
filmmakers are now facing a 1 to 20 odds of having their films shown in major
festivals. This is less than playing the lottery.
It is distressing for me, having been making films for more than 40 years to see
the festival situation become so debased. The volume of work being entered is
drowning these festivals in both admin, and creative decisions. I have served on
juries in many festivals and noticed when I looked at the list of the films
rejected by pre screeners that many great films had been rejected. As a judge I
requested to view those rejected and found most of the films selected by me were
shown at these particular festivals. Since the volume of entered work in most
well known festivals far exceeds the festivals ability to manage this volume,
that a new structure needs to be put in place. This would be a great service to
the filmmakers entering their works into these festivals.
Dominic Angerame
________________________________
________________________________
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
email suppressed>
http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
www.decodawson.com<http://www.decodawson.com>
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
email suppressed>
http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
email suppressed
http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
email suppressed
http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks