From: Ken Bawcom (email suppressed)
Date: Sun Feb 20 2011 - 23:18:17 PST
Quoting Bryan Konefsky <email suppressed>:
> An interesting and ongoing discussion... some
> observations:
>
> The Ann Arbor Film Festival is no longer an experimental
> film festival... They now call themselves an "independent"
> film festival. One of the reasons they receive so many
> submissions dates back to when they first signed on with
> Withoutabox. There, they made the decision to include
> narrative and documentary works as well as experimental,
> and their submission numbers skyrocketed... However, for
> the kind of festival they are, I think they still do a
> good job.
I'm afraid that I have to correct Bryan. I attended my first AAFF in
1967. I was on the screening committee from 1989, until 2006, IIRC. I
was also involved in programming most of that time. Even though it is
primarily experimental, the AAFF has accepted documentary, animated,
and narrative films for decades, well before Withoutabox. The first
year I screened, I think there were almost 400 entries. The last year
I screened, I believe it was about 2500.
There are several reasons for the increase in entries. WAB is only
one. From its beginning, the AAFF accepted only 16mm film. All entries
were viewed in their entirety, by the screening committee as a group.
Then 35mm and videos were accepted for programming. That increased the
entries quite a bit, and the screening system went through radical
changes. Due to philosophical differences, I resigned from the
screening committee. Under the current director, the process has
improved from what it was when I resigned, and may well be as good as
at any other festival. But I believe it is still quite different from
what I would consider ideal. I believe there are ways to organize a
screening committee, so that it need not depend on prescreeners. But,
the screeners would have to devote so much time that you could
probably only recruit them by offering a decent honorarium. And not
many festivals could afford that.
Back to Dominic's original concern. Of those thousands of entries, a
lot is truly awful. I have seen what amounted to soap opera narratives
labeled "experimental" by their maker. I have seen calling card films
where you could tell what the filmmaker's favorite TV show was. I've
seen lame adolescent humor that looked like it was made in a day by a
highschool kid.
But, there really IS enough good film to program two AAFFs. In the
last few years I screened, I'd say that there were enough really good
feature-length films alone to fill the total programming time, and I'm
not talking mostly narrative features either. Every year, there are
films that don't get programmed that are so good I want to cry when
they don't get shown. I did prescreen last year, and saw a film of
Myron's that I thought really should have been programmed, but wasn't.
What to do? Well, the AAFF has expanded programming some films in
competition in a second, smaller, screen at the Michigan Theater. That
added some time. I don't think it possible for the festival to get
much longer. It is so much work that staff are worn out at the end of
the six days. Actually, they are probably pretty beat before the
festival even starts, as there is so much work.
There are special showings of curated films not in competition, both
in the main theater, and the smaller one. For years, and to several
directors, I lobbied to eliminate all but one of the special events,
to free up more time for competition programming, but it hasn't
happened. Even that would be problematic. The judges can't be in two
theaters at once. So, they either have to watch screeners of some
things before they come to the festival, or spend all their off hours
watching programmed films in the office. That's a big load.
I believe the AAFF does waive entry fees for filmmakers who have been
programmed. I lobbied for that too, but I don't know that my lobbying
brought it about. I want to make it clear that I don't speak for the
AAFF. My only involvement this year, besides attending the festival,
is to smoke meats for the green room.
Ken B.
"Those who would give up essential liberty
to purchase a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty, nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin 1775
"I know that the hypnotized never lie... Do ya?"
Pete Townshend 1971
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
email suppressed
http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks