They keep eliminating all the good slow stocks! Very depressing.
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Beebe,Roger W <rogerbb_at_ufl.edu> wrote:
> 72-twelve. Here's the official notice from October:
>
> http://motion.kodak.com/motion/uploadedFiles/PCN0090510_Q.pdf
>
> <http://motion.kodak.com/motion/uploadedFiles/PCN0090510_Q.pdf>FYI,
> RB
>
> On May 5, 2011, at 3:54 PM, Jean-Louis Seguin wrote:
>
>
> On 2011-05-05, at 1:00 PM, Beebe,Roger W wrote:
>
> Did anyone comment here on the discontinuation of Kodak 7212 (100T). I
> know more than one filmmaker (Rob Todd, Tony Gault) has mentioned to me that
> they've used that in their JK optical printers. Apparently Kodak announced
> its discontinuation in October, and they expect us to use 7213 (200T)
> instead. I'm sure they're not thinking about people who want SLOWER stocks
> & for whom too little light isn't an issue, but this seems like a
> significant loss. I know there was the recent thread on print stocks here,
> and those remain good options, but it's terrible to lose one more tool from
> the toolkit.
>
>
> Anyway, for those who hadn't already heard, heads up.
>
> Roger
>
>
>
> I remember using 7272 as a color intermediate print stock for 16mm . It
> looks like it's still in the Kodak catalog. 1200 ft rolls.
>
> Cheers,
> Jean-Louis
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks_at_jonasmekasfilms.com
> http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks_at_jonasmekasfilms.com
> http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks_at_jonasmekasfilms.com
http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
Received on Thu May 05 2011 - 13:28:39 CDT
