Re: Art: practical or not? (was something else)

From: James Macgillivray (email suppressed)
Date: Tue Jan 30 2007 - 10:24:14 PST


We can discuss subject (below) under above subject heading. I hope.

I say, "not practical"

>From: saul ostrow

>Reply-To: Experimental Film Discussion List <email suppressed>
>To: email suppressed
>Subject: Re: HH - response
>Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:04:11 -0500
>
>actually art has many practical purposes and uses - until it becomes
>standardized, cliched and banal
>On Jan 30, 2007, at 4:40 AM, Nicholas Hamlyn wrote:
>
>>On 27 Jan 2007, at 00:30, Cari Machet wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>academic:
>>>
>>
>>> Having no practical purpose or use.
>>
>>Like art, for example?
>>
>>
>>__________________________________________________________________
>>For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
>>
>>--
>>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>>believed to be clean.
>
>
>__________________________________________________________________
>For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.

_________________________________________________________________
Buy what you want when you want it on Sympatico / MSN Shopping
http://shopping.sympatico.msn.ca/content/shp/?ctId=2,ptnrid=176,ptnrdata=081805

__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.