From: Jack Sargeant (email suppressed)
Date: Tue Dec 16 2008 - 13:31:16 PST
oh, don't worry, I thought it was humorously delivered (and deserved)
sarcasm!
hence my reply
jack
> Jack ,
> no sarcasm intended. I enjoyed your book and the others as well !
> owen
>
>
>
> On Dec 15, 2008, at 11:29 PM, Jack Sargeant wrote:
>
>> owen - sarcasm duly noted.
>>
>> one thing, as of today on amazon Light Moving in Time is $135.
>>
>> Naked Lens is better value at $15!
>>
>> (and yes I know Film at Witts End is $12)
>> but Naked Lens has more pages....
>>
>> Jack
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Ooooo, naked lens: beat cinema, by Jack Sargeant and while your at
>>> it
>>> add William C. Wees: Light Moving In Time
>>> and Brakhage's Film At Wits End , what a great holiday package for
>>> the
>>> ag film fanatic on your list.
>>> owen
>>>
>>> On Dec 15, 2008, at 5:58 AM, Jack Sargeant wrote:
>>>
>>>> dizzy gillespie's guacha guero was used for No 2....
>>>>
>>>> this may be a good point to suggest that for anybody wondering about
>>>> christmas gifts the new edition of naked lens: beat cinema
>>>> (published by soft skull, expanded and so on edition) is available
>>>> from all good bookshops, amazon and so on..... it features, of
>>>> course, a chapter of harry smith...enough sales shtick
>>>>
>>>> jack
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________
>>> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________
>> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
>
__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.