From: Myron Ort (email suppressed)
Date: Fri Jun 19 2009 - 11:43:53 PDT
I assume it was shown at 24fps sound speed?
mo
On Jun 19, 2009, at 10:51 AM, Jim Flannery wrote:
> Thursday, June 18, 2009, 12:22:56 PM, one spoke:
>
> F> If it were me, I wouldn't hesitate to just contact print it and
> F> project it scope. Obviously everything would be stretched out but
> F> personally I like that kind of thing.
>
> If memory serves, according to the liner notes when Sistiaga's film
> was
> screened in SF a few years ago that's *exactly* what he did:
> painted it
> with the understanding that what came from his hand was
> "compressed" and
> would be stretched out in projection (he also painted *the whole
> surface* -- see strip image on SFC site here:
> http://www.sfcinematheque.org/calendar-40706.shtml?x=42 (bottom of
> page). When you're watching it you certainly think at some points "Wow
> looka all flat ovoids!"
>
> Interesting that the little clip Jorge pointed to is *not* stretched.
>
> And tagging on to last burst of emails: it was shown silent.
>
> --
> Jim Flannery
> email suppressed
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
>
__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.