From: gregg biermann (email suppressed)
Date: Tue Jul 20 2010 - 10:48:15 PDT
Pip,
I'm not stating that there is no use for film in the present -- only
that mechanical technologies are part of an earlier age than digital
technologies. In that sense they are associated more with the past. That
fits within the discussion about originality -- no?
G
Pip Chodorov wrote:
> What technologies of the past?
> Photography and film are still technologies of the present (and
> cheaper than digital).
> Was someone discussing typesetting or daguerrotypes?
> -Pip Chodorov
>
>
> At 13:26 -0400 20/07/10, gregg biermann wrote:
>
>> It is
>> interesting though that there has been a consistent, perhaps obsessive
>> interest in the technologies of the past discussed here as this also
>> suggests a retrospective vector.
>> Gregg
>>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> email suppressed
> http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
email suppressed
http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks