Re: [Frameworks] Please stop responding WITH the attachment. It's overloading my computer.

From: Jonathan Thomas <cinemametafisica_at_yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:44:52 +0100 (BST)

I've been trying not to get involved in this thread, but reading Cari's statement that: "experimental film isn't actually about anything it lives in an apolitical vacuum void of content and humanity" leaves me speechless!!! From: Cari Machet <carimachet_at_gmail.com> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks_at_jonasmekasfilms.com> Sent: Tue, 12 July, 2011 23:10:29 Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Please stop responding WITH the attachment. It's overloading my computer. i was not assuming that someone that went to yale was rich i assumed they had access like you know how there are people on this small planet that do not have wireless access points or computers even - you heard about that but my original point is totally missed i was telling him not to tell people what to do which is humorous in itself whatever - doesn't really matter as you said because experimental film isn't actually about anything it lives in an apolitical vacuum void of content and humanity and someone telling other people on entire list serve what to do based on their need base and their need base alone is just perfectly fine humane ethical and peachy i love it Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Skype carimachet - 646-652-6434 Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Twitter: @carimachet On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Jonathan Walley <walleyj@denison.edu> wrote: The answer to your last question, unfortunately, is yes. Every year, usually in the summer, there is a flamewar about email etiquette on this list, involving all sorts of attempts - some reasonably worded, others WAYYY too angry - to regulate how people express themselves on the list, what people should or should not do when sending emails to the list, how attachments and the like should be handled, etc., etc. And typically, as has been the case in this round, assumptions are made about people based on the most scant, paltry evidence imaginable (someone from Yale MUST be a rich kid, anyone with an "edu" at the end of their email address must be a flabby academic who "couldn't do" and so decided to teach, and so forth...). > > >Maybe it's the heat getting to us, or the boredom for those who are off from >teaching (myself included). But whatever it is, I don't take it as a sign of >life. When people on Frameworks get passionate, angry, contentious, even >downright snarky, about experimental film, then I love it. But this perennial >flare-up, my LEAST favorite one, is tiresome. > > >Love to all, >Jonathan > > >p.s. my FAVORITE perennial flare-up is "what is experimental film?" > > > >On Jul 12, 2011, at 4:08 PM, Dennis Williams wrote: > >i'd like to ban smiley faces. and those from ivy league schools with poorly >functioning computers, and those who suggest bans, and those who are too >sensitive, and... okay. i've had my laughs. is this typical? if so, i'll now >spend more time on frameworks! yes, we're alive! and kicking, and biting, and >scratching. > >>dennis >> >> >>On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Dennis Williams <wdcwdfilm@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>:) >>> >>> >>> >>>On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Matt Helme <dcinema2134@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>>Some groups just don't allow attachments, it may be spam or a virus. We should >>>have the same rule. >>>>Matt >>>> >>>>http://www.youtube.com/user/oscarthepug1234 http://www.matthelme.webs.com/ >>>> >>>>--- On Tue, 7/12/11, Fred Camper <f@fredcamper.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>From: Fred Camper <f@fredcamper.com> >>>>>Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Please stop responding WITH the attachment. It's >>>>>overloading my computer. >>>>>To: "Experimental Film Discussion List" <frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com> >>>>>Date: Tuesday, July 12, 2011, 4:27 PM >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Quoting Chuck Kleinhans <chuckkle@northwestern.edu>: >>>>> >>>>>> Well, this isn't a very helpful attitude.... >>>>> >>>>>> On Jul 11, 2011, at 11:30 PM, Cari Machet wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> please buy a proper computer >>>>> >>>>>It's a lot worse than not very helpful. TELLING someone to buy a new >>>>>computer??? How rude can you get. We don't know his financial >>>>>situation, or how he chooses to spend his money. >>>>> >>>>>My vote would be for restricting all FrameWorks posts to plain text >>>>>email. Let's ban all attachments, not just the 4 MB ones, and ban >>>>>html. I don't know if this is possible, and maybe most won't want to >>>>>do this, but to me, everything other than plain text is bad manners, >>>>>and usually some kind of advertising. Put your video or whatever on >>>>>the Web and post the link. >>>>> >>>>>Fred Camper >>>>>Chicago >>>>> >>>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>>FrameWorks mailing list >>>>>FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com >>>>>https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >>>>> >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>FrameWorks mailing list >>>>FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com >>>>https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>Dennis Williams >>>914.671.2746 >>>www.dennisanthonywilliams.com >>> >>>"if you think art is neutral you're kidding yourself and ignoring history." -- >>> >> >> >>-- >>Dennis Williams >>914.671.2746 >>www.dennisanthonywilliams.com >> >>"if you think art is neutral you're kidding yourself and ignoring history." -- >>_______________________________________________ >>FrameWorks mailing list >>FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com >>https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >> >Jonathan Walley >Assistant Professor of Cinema >Denison University >walleyj@denison.edu > >_______________________________________________ >FrameWorks mailing list >FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com >https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > >


_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks_at_jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
Received on Wed Jul 13 2011 - 03:45:05 CDT