Chill, ladies? LOL, for real?
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 8:28 PM, David Tetzlaff <djtet53_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Chill, ladies. This was a quickly composed email note, with a few examples
> tossed out off the top of Mr. Yalkut's head, not an exhaustive or
> representative list. All he meant to say is "Yeah, there are some people who
> do this."
>
> To find significance in what is excluded in an off-the-cuff reply is a bit
> of an over-reach.
>
> One could certainly take the msg. as an opportunity to draw attention to
> other artists who have used 'intermedia' processes, lighting a candle rather
> than whining about what Yalkut didn't say.
>
> Actually, during this discussion I was thinking of the piece Jen Reeves
> shot on video (SHADOWS CHOOSE THEIR HORRORS, I think??). Anyway, when I saw
> it, i recall thinking the video image looked awful, and really detracted
> from the piece, which suffered greatly in comparison to the work Reeves has
> done in 16mm. Again, I don't think this proves anything about necessary
> distinctions between 'film' and 'video' as essences, but there's a lot of
> lame video out there, for sure.
>
> ---
>
> I know, as already mentioned, that Jem Cohen has shot in Super-8, gone
> through digital intermediate, and back to higher rez film or video with very
> lovely results. If memory serves me, I think Reynolds Reynolds and Patrick
> Jolie used a similar process for their films.
>
>
> On Aug 25, 2011, at 5:13 PM, Sandra Maliga wrote:
>
> > with some women on it.
> >
> >
> > On Aug 24, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Shelly Silver wrote:
> >
> >> this list should be way longer.
> >>
> >> On Aug 24, 2011, at 10:37 AM, Jud Yalkut wrote:
> >>
> >>> Filmmakers who have used video sometimwes interchangeably include:
> >>> Ed Emshwiller, Stan Vanderbeek, Scott Bartlett, Tom Dewitt, and myself,
> Jud Yalkut.
> >>> I particularly am intrigued by the contrasts in tactility between the
> two media,
> >>> the qualituies of light, the volume of the image, depth of field, and
> granularities.
> >>> One cannot say one is better than another, but gloriously different.
>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks_at_jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks_at_jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
Received on Thu Aug 25 2011 - 18:31:32 CDT
