From: Tony Conrad (email suppressed)
Date: Sat Mar 11 2006 - 08:46:10 PST
It is worth bearing in mind that the masochistic tropism of audience
members, who in their capacity as audience members submit to the film,
induces a (mild) form of social "sadism" among filmmakers that--albeit
often unconscious--is more focused in its authoritarian aspects than
is the killer-sadism of fishing.
--------t0ny
Quoting field <email suppressed>:
> the big difference
>
>
> fishing is not about communication
>
> its not about relating to others or transporting a
> idea/message/feeling...
>
>
>
> but obviously you can do films just for himself and leave them in a
> cabinet
>
> that's the artist right
>
>
> patrick huber
>
>
>
>
> >--- "jarrod whaley." <email suppressed> wrote:
> >
> >> So you would argue that there's no difference between being an
> >> experimental filmmaker and being a recreational fisherman, for
> >> example?
> >>
> >> -->jarrod whaley.
> >
> >Wow, that's a giant leap in logic. Both are hobbies, yes, but one
> is
> >fishing and one is filmmaking. I would, however, argue that
> >experimental filmmaking can be a very pleasuarble activity, and
> like
> >fishing, contains stretches of inactivity, anticipation,
> frustration,
> >and success.
> >
> >Every hobby (as well as every vocation) is unique. I know the
> reasons
> >I make film are different than the reasons I paint, make music,
> play
> >soccer, go hiking, read travel books, or cook desserts. What they
> have
> >in common is that I don't earn any income from them, I do them
> because
> >I enjoy them. The energy I put into each activity and the possible
> >rewards are drastically different.
> >
> >-Jason Halprin
> >
> >--- "jarrod whaley." <email suppressed> wrote:
> >
> >> So you would argue that there's no difference between being an
> >> experimental filmmaker and being a recreational fisherman, for
> >> example?
> >>
> >> -->jarrod whaley.
> >> filmmaker. videographer.
> >> web designer. educator.
> >> www.oakstreetfilms.com
> >> www.shakingray.com
> >> design.oakstreetfilms.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Jason Halprin wrote:
> >> > >From the Oxford American Dictionary:
> >> >
> >> > hobby - an occupation that a person does for pleasure, not as
> his
> >> main
> >> > business
> >> >
> >> > I never insuated that dedicating your life and energy to
> something
> >> that
> >> > is not financially rewarding does cannot have serious rewards.
> I
> >> just
> >> > mean that teaching, currating, working in a post house, working
> in
> >> the
> >> > film/television industry, and other jobs that many on this list
> do
> >> are
> >> > not making a living from your filmmaking. They are working a
> job,
> >> your
> >> > filmmaking is supported by this other job.
> >> >
> >> > I personally find it insulting that the extremely hard work
> that
> >> some
> >> > people have put in to create venues and organizations that
> promote
> >> A/G
> >> > work is so easily dismissed as self-serving.
> >> >
> >> > -Jason Halprin
> >> >
> >> > --- "jarrod whaley." <email suppressed> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Jason Halprin wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> One of the basic facts that exists for many A/G film and
> video
> >> >>>
> >> >> makers
> >> >>
> >> >>> (in the US and elsewhere, though not everywhere) is that
> they
> >> will
> >> >>> never recoup the costs that are associated with their work,
> let
> >> >>>
> >> >> alone
> >> >>
> >> >>> turn it into a full-time profession. As such it is more
> >> accuratley
> >> >>> described as a hobby, and hobbies are money-losing ventures.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >> Baloney. One might not accumulate riches on par with the
> Sultan of
> >>
> >> >> Brunei, but many "underground" or "avant-garde" filmmakers can
> and
> >> do
> >> >>
> >> >> scratch out a meager existence. It just takes a little
> creativity,
> >> >> and
> >> >> the willingness to realize that good work doesn't have to cost
> a
> >> >> penny,
> >> >> if necessary, to make.
> >> >>
> >> >> I find this "hobby" business of yours very insulting.
> Dedicating
> >> >> one's
> >> >> life and energy to an often financially unrewarding (but
> often
> >> >> financially "livable") form of creativity is not on the same
> level
> >> of
> >> >>
> >> >> engagement and/or social worth as collecting Star Wars action
> >> figures
> >> >> or
> >> >> building model planes. Be careful with that glue, it's
> dangerous
> >> >> stuff,
> >> >> you know.
> >> >>
> >> >>> If you are against paying fees, look for free festivals. Or
> >> >>>
> >> >> volunteer
> >> >>
> >> >>> for one so that your labor may bring down the fees for that
> >> >>>
> >> >> festival.
> >> >>
> >> >>> Write the grant proposals, talk to donors, make press
> releases,
> > > >>>
> >> >> pass
> >> >>
> >> >>> out flyers, get on the radio, do whatever it takes. It is
> >> already
> >> >>> difficult for most of us the share our work with people we
> don't
> >> >>> personally know, so if festivals are not a necessity, they
> are a
> >> >>>
> >> >> luxury
> >> >>
> >> >>> I believe is worth paying for.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >> If you think it's worth paying for someone to potentially
> throw
> >> your
> >> >> work away and never tell you, then go ahead. Wipe your ass
> with
> >> $100
> >> >> bills, for all I care. I just happen to find Charmin to be
> much
> >> more
> >> >> cost efficient, not to mention less irritating to my
> sensitive
> >> bits.
> >> >>
> >> >> -->jarrod whaley.
> >> >> filmmaker. videographer.
> >> >> web designer. educator.
> >> >> www.oakstreetfilms.com
> >> >> www.shakingray.com
> >> >> design.oakstreetfilms.com
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> __________________________________________________________________
> >> >> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at
> <email suppressed>.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > __________________________________________________
> >> > Do You Yahoo!?
> >> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
> around
> >> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> __________________________________________________________________
> >> > For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at
> <email suppressed>.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> __________________________________________________________________
> >> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at
> <email suppressed>.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________________________
> >For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
>
>
__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.