Sergei Loznitsa, Eve Heller, Michelle Smith

---

From:  Jeff Kreines <(address suppressed)>
Reply-To:  Experimental Film Discussion List <(address suppressed)>
To:  (address suppressed)
Subject:  Re: camcorders
Date:  Mon, 24 Jul 2006 03:50:37 -0500
>On Jul 24, 2006, at 3:01 AM, David Tetzlaff wrote:
>
>>Realize, though, that getting good sound is less a matter of  
>>variations in
>>mic technology and more about skill in the field - avoiding ambient
>>  noises
>>and getting the mic close to the subject...
>
>
>I've always felt it's the RIGHT mic in the RIGHT place.
>
>The reason I am suggesting the Sony is that I think it's crazy to  
>shoot SD video if you can shoot HDV for the same price.  Even if you
>  release your film in SD, the added resolution will help.  And the  
>Sony is the best of the bargains, at the moment -- the AU1 is a  
>better choice but it costs more than the suggested budget, as does  
>the right mic (Schoeps).
>
>Choice of mic depends on what you are recording.  Sounds like there  
>was a lot of music, which means stereo, and double system makes
>sense  (obviously you have the MD or DAT (I'd go with MD) recorder
>and also  the camera audio to work with in editing.
>
>
>__________________________________________________________________
>For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <(address suppressed)>.